CWP- 17281-2025 -1- 135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- 17281-2025 Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 DINESH KUMAR ..... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the transfer order, dated 04/05.06.2025, qua the petitioner who is working as Craft Instructor at GITI Gurugram. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before respondents. At this stage, petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide his pending representation, dated 28.05.2025, Annexure P-5, in a specified period. He has also relied upon the judgment dated 26.05.2025 in CWP- 14733-2025 titled Shyam Sunder Yadav and others v. State of Haryana and others passed by this Court in case of similarly situated Storekeepers in the Department. 3. Notice of motion. Seema 2025.07.03 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP- 17281-2025 -2- 4. Mr. Harish Nain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and submits that the pending representation, dated 28.05.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director, Skill Development and Industrial Training by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, and in terms of Shyam Sunder Yadav case (supra) within a period of four weeks. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 01.07.2025 JUDGE Sima Sima Sima Sima Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Seema 2025.07.03 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document