Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6938 (KAR)

MR NARASIMHA GANAPAYYA BHAT v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/105819/2023 · 2025-03-06

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4337 WP No. 105819 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 105819 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MR. NARASIMHA GANAPAYYA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O GANAPAYYA BHAT, R/AT: #116, ANGADIBAIL, ACHAVE POST, ANKOLA TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA, KARNATAKA-581 344. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.P.HEGDE AND SRI. VENKATESH SAMAREDDI, ADVOCATES [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, KARWAR, PIN-581 301. 3. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANKOLA POLICE STATION, BESIDES TAHSILDAR OFFICE, ANKOLA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, PIN-581 314. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4337 WP No. 105819 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 04.03.2025, on that day, though matter called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 06.03.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62