Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69376 (KAR)

MRS. SHANTHAMANI v. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER

WP/10358/2025 · 2025-11-06

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44894 WP No. 10358 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 10358 OF 2025 (L-RES) BETWEEN: MRS. SHANTHAMANI, W/O. PERIYASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT. PEIYA BANE DIVISION, KFDC, AIVARNAD, SULLIA TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 574239. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, KDFC, AIVARNADU RUBBER DIVISION, SULLIA, D.K. DISTRICT - 574239. 2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, KFDC, P.B.NO.930, KULSHEKAR, MANGALURU - 575005. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44894 WP No. 10358 of 2025 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.10.2025. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. However, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Despite granting sufficient time, office objections are also not complied with. In view of peremptory order dated 08.10.2025, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non- prosecution. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44894 WP No. 10358 of 2025 Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP,KMV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9