- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28485 WP No. 14784 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14784 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GIRIJA M.C W/O. SRI.SANTOSH H.G, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. MASTER BHAANUPRAKASH S S/O. SRI.SANTOSH H.G, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS 3. MASTER BENKAGOWDA S/O. SRI.SANTOSH H.G, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS THE PETITIONER NOS. 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS, REP.BY 1ST PETITIONER SMT. GIRIJA M.C AS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN ALL ARE R/AT MALLEGOWDANAKOPPAL VILLAGE, YELWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT -571 130 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI. SANTOSH H.G S/O.SRIGOPALGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, CHIKKANAHALLI, YELWALA HOBLI, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28485 WP No. 14784 of 2025 OPP. GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, MYSURU TALUK & DISTRICT- 571 130 …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22/03/2024 IN CRL. MISC NO. 972/2022, IMPUGNED ORDER ON JOINT MEMO, WHICH IS (ORDER SHEET) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, AS WELL AS, IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/12/2024 (ON RECALLING IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22/03/2024, BOTH ORDERS ARE PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT, AT MYSORE, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed on 17.04.2025. On 22.07.2025 the matter is listed before this Court for non-compliance of office objections, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court had directed the matter to be listed for 'dismissal' on 23.07.2025. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28485 WP No. 14784 of 2025 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84