Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No. 218 of 2020 Sibananda Panigrahi & Others ..... Appellants Mr. S. Jena, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Panda, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 26.03.2025 Order No. 3 I.A. NO.186 of 2020 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard. 3. Considering the grounds taken, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. The I.A. stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Order No. 4 FAO No. 218 of 2020 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present appeal is Page 2 of 2. covered by the judgment of this Court so passed on 19.03.2025 in FAO No.509 of 2014 and batch. 3. In view of such submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present FAO is disposed of in the light of judgment so passed in FAO No.509 of 2014 and batch. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge sangita