SUKHWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6257/2025 · 2025-06-12
Kirti Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69347 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69347 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6257-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.120
CRWP-6257-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.06.2025
Sukhwinder Kaur and others
..... Petitioners
VERSUS State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH
Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for the petitioners.
***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral)
This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to the official respondent(s) to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondent Nos.4 to 6 (arrayed in the petition) and to take action on their representation dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P1).
2.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P1) before respondent No.2 raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereupon. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if, appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2, to consider and decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and to take necessary action thereupon.
3.
Notice of motion. Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.12 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6257-2025 (O&M) 2
4.
Served with an advance copy of the petition, Mr. Luvinder Sofat, Senior DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course.
5.
In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is
disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P1) of the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.
6.
Needless to say, if any threat perception is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in
order to protect their life and liberty.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
(KIRTI SINGH)
JUDGE
12.06.2025 Ramandeep Singh
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.12 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document