MANISH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/6403/2025 · 2025-06-17
Anil Kshetarpal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69338 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69338 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6403-2025(O&M) Date of decision:17.06.2025
Manish Kumar and another ..Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners (through VC) Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, Addl. AG, Haryana ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral) Both the petitioners as well as respondents no.3 and 4 are the residents of State of Rajasthan. The petitioners claim that they are residing in Village Suthani, District Rewari.
Learned State counsel submits that the local police upon verification has found that the petitioners are not residing at Village Suthani, District Rewari. Hence, the petitioners, if so advised, may file an appropriate petition in the State of Rajasthan.
Disposed of. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 17.06.2025
JUDGE rekha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No REKHA SIHAG 2025.06.17 01:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh