Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69337 (KAR)

SHRI. GIRISH NATHAN v. ASST. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

WP/7908/2022 · 2025-12-08

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51724 WP No. 7908 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO.7908 OF 2022 (L-PF) BETWEEN: SHRI. GIRISH NATHAN, S/O. K.N.GAYATHRINATHAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, M/S GREYS EXIM, NO/ A2/309/48/49, SHAH & NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SITARAMA JADHAV MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI - 400 013. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANJUNATHA B., ADVOCATE) AND: ASST. PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & RECOVERY OFFICER EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, PEENYA, NO.62, 3RD CROSS, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YASHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU - 560 022. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51724 WP No. 7908 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Sri.Naveen Kumar, counsel on behalf of Sri.Manjunath B., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M Pradeep, counsel for respondent, appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the writ petition. 4. Memo and the oral submission is placed on record. 5. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33