JAHUR MOHAMMAD S/O NOOR MOHAMMAD v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2175/2025 · 2025-03-11
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6933 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6933 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2175/2025 Jahur Mohammad S/o Noor Mohammad, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Barodiya, Police Station- Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Jail, Bundi) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Aswal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP and Mr. Praveen Sharma, Adv., for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 11/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.37/2025 registered at Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC and Section 66D of IT Act. Investigating is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 120-B of IPC and Section 66D of IT Act.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that basically there was a money dispute between the parties and same has been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody
[2025:RJ-JP:11159] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2175/2025] since 29.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that dispute has already been resolved by the parties amicably; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Jahur Mohammad S/o Noor Mohammad shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/125