Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69314 (ORI)

RAJESH KUMAR JENA v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/14091/2024 · 2025-01-20

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.14091 of 2024 1) Rajesh Kumar Jena ..... Petitioners 2) Ramachandra @ Silu Naik 3) Narayan Swain Represented By Adv. - Himanshu Sekhar Mishra -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – A. Pati, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 27.03.2025 Order No. I.A. No.483 of 2025 03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. This I.A. has been filed by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking modification of order dated 20.01.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that in order dated 20.01.2025, it was mentioned that in the event the Petitioners are having more than one criminal antecedent, the order dated 20.01.2025 shall not be given effect to. He further submitted that after the verification, it was known that the Petitioners are having more than two criminal antecedents besides the present case, therefore, the Petitioners could not take advantage of order dated 20.01.2025. Therefore, it was submitted that the order dated 20.01.2025 be modified. Page 2 of 2. 4. Considering the submission, the order dated 20.01.2025 stands modified to the extent that in the event it is found that the Petitioners are having more than two criminal antecedents besides the present case, then this order shall not be given effect to. Rest part of the conditions imposed in order dated 20.01.2025 shall remain intact. 5. In view of the aforesaid modification, now the Petitioners are subject to depositing cash security of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousands) of each instead of cash security of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousands) of each before the learned Court in seisin over the matter, which shall be kept in any Nationalized bank in interest bearing account initially for a period of one year which will be renewable from time to time till conclusion of trial and the same shall be abide by the final outcome of the trial of the case. 6. In view of such modification, the time to surrender of the Petitioners before the Court below is extended to another four weeks from today subject to depositing cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund of Orissa High Court Bar Association within fifteen days and furnishing money receipt thereof in proof of deposit. 7. It is made clear that, if the cost is not deposited within the stipulated time, time extended for the petitioners to surrender shall stand revoked automatically. 8. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil SAHOO