Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69271 (MAD)

MUNNA @ K.MOHAMMED KAIF v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP/18115/2025 · 2025-06-27

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.18115 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.18115 of 2025 Munna @ K.Mohammed Kaif ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ambur, Ambur - 635 802 Crime No.02 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.02 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Abdurrahman For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.01.2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 65(2) of BNS, Section 5(m) and 5(1), 4(2) of POCSO Act, 2012 in Spl.S.C.No.28 of 2025 on the file of the District and Sessions Court at Tirupattur in connection with Crime No.02 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18115 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had committed penetrative sexual assault against the victim girl aged about 10 years. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that, petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. He also produced the statement of the victim girl under Section 183 of BNSS, wherein the victim girl had categorically stated that the petitioner had committed penetrative sexual assault against her. 4. Considering the age of the victim and the charges against the petitioner appears to be very serious and heinous, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18115 of 2025 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 27.06.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ambur, Ambur - 635 802 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18115 of 2025 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.18115 of 2025 27.06.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis