Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6927 (JHR)

MOIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/173/2024 · 2025-05-09

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14053 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 173 of 2024 ----- 1. Moin Ansari, S/o Smsuddin Ansari, R/o Village-Pakrar, P.O.-Salgawan (Sultana), P.S.-Katkamdag, District- Hazaribagh 2. Ram Kumar Kushwaha, S/o Lalman Kushwaha, R/o Village-Hedlag, P.O.-Kanchanpur (Lupung), P.S.- Katkamsandi, District-Hazaribagh 3. Santosh Kumar, S/o Pokhan Mahto, R/o Village-Hedlag, P.O.-Kanchanpur (Lupung), P.S.-Katkamsandi, District- Hazaribagh. 4. Shambhu Ram, S/o Jawahar Ram, R/o Village-Hedlag, P.O.-Kanchanpur (Lupung), P.S.-Katkamsandi, District- Hazaribagh. .......... Petitioners. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Naincy Sahay, the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 3. Sri Abbu Imran, the Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 4. Sri Chandan Kumar, the Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 5. Smt. Megha Bhardwaj, the Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 6. Sri Naman Priyesh Lakra, the Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 7. Smt. Jadhav Vijay Narayan Rao, the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 8. Sri Varun Ranjan, the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 9. Sri Anjaneyulu Dodde, the Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 10. Sri Vishal Sagar, the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 11. Sri Shashi Bhushan Mehra, the Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 12. Sri Zeeshan Qamer, the Deputy Commissioner, Godda 13. Sri Hemant Sati, the Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj 14. Sri Subash Sharma, the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Shubham Gautam, A.C. to A.A.G.-V ----- Order No.04 Date: 09.05.2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties alleging wilful violation of the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in W.P. (S) No. 5995 of 2019. 2025:JHHC:14053 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid order of this Court has now been complied. 3. Considering the said submission, there is no need to further proceed in the present matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped. 4. The present contempt case stands disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Vikas/