Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6926 (UTT)

IMRAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1033/2021 · 2025-02-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 1033 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. 1. There is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Petitioners have sought quashing of F.I.R. No. 222 of 2021, registered against them for offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C. in Police Station Bahadrabad, District Haridwar. 4. Learned State Counsel submits that upon investigation, closure/final report has been filed against the petitioners on 01.03.2022, as Investigating Officer has not found sufficient evidence to proceed against the petitioners. He thus submits that writ petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of this subsequent development, this Court finds substance in the submission made by learned State Counsel that after filing of closure report nothing survive in this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.02.2025 Aswal