- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2798 WP No. 104396 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 104396 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. BASALINGAMMA D/O LATE RANGAPPA @ SANNARANGAPPA W/O G. KRISHNA, AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. HOUSE NO.21-358/8 TIRUMALA SRINIVAS NAGAR, ADONI (POST) 518302 DIST. KARNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.S. PATIL, ADV) AND: 1. SRI. G. POMPAPATHY S/O LATE RANGAPPA @ SANNARANGAPPA AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. ARLIGANUR VILLAGE, TQ. SIRUGUPPA-583101, DIST. BALLARI. 2. SMT. JAYAMMA D/O LATE RANGAPPA @ SANNA RANGAPPA, W/O. KANTHAPPA AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NAGANATHANAHALLI (POST) 518302 ADONI, MANDALAM, DIST. KARNOOL. 3 SRI. LOKESH, S/O. SRI G. POMPAPATHY AGE. 15 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER R1, SRI. G. POMPAPATHY S/O LATE RANGAPPA @ SANNARANGAPPA AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. ARLIGANUR VILLAGE, TQ. SIRUGUPPA-583101, DIST. BALLARI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADV FOR R1, NOTICE TO R2 & R3 ARE SERVED) Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2798 WP No. 104396 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT QUASHING ORDER DATED 2.9.2022 ON IA NO. 10 FILED UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 IN OS NO. 154/2015 ON THE FILE OF HONOURABLE CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC SIRUGUPPA (VIDE ANNEXURE-A). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the interlocutory application passed in O.S.No.154/2015. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the suit in O.S.No.154/2015 has been disposed of vide judgment dated 24.08.2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. 4. As the main suit itself is disposed of and the order passed on the interlocutory application in the suit, has been impugned in this petition, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition has become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2798 WP No. 104396 of 2022 5. In view of the above discussion, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE rs CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38