AMIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS SECRETARY HOME U.P AT LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER
A482/25168/2025 · 2025-07-17
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117443 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25168 of 2025 Applicant :- Amit Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Through Its Secretary Home U.P At Lucknow And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pushpendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
1. Sri Pushpendra Singh Lodhi, learned counsel for the applicants on instructions submits that though the application under Section 528 of BNSS (wrongly reported by the office under Section 482 CrPC) has been preferred by the applicant for quashing the proceeding of Complaint Case No.887 of 2024, Smt. Pratibha Versus Amit Kumar and others, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Police Station Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahr, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. 3rd Bulandshahr, however, he confines his relief for expeditious disposal.
2. Sri Bhuwal Vishwakarma, learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
3. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of directing the court below to decide the aforesaid proceedings with most expedition without granting unnecessary adjournment strictly in accordance with the law of the land, subject to legal impediment.
4. Office to convert this 482 CrPC Application into Section 528 BNSS. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 N.S.Rathour (Vikas Budhwar, J) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad