HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22501 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Madhava Nand Shukla, learned counsel for the first informant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed by the applicant- Monu with a prayer to release him on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.50 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 352, 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station- Sikheda, District Muzaffar Nagar. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is further submitted that in the F.I.R., general role has been assigned by the injured himself. However, in the statement recorded under Section 180 of B.N.S.S., specific allegation has been assigned against the applicant and co-accused causing injuries by Farsa. From the bare perusal of the injury report of the injured, it is clear that all the injuries cannot be caused by Farsa. It is further submitted that the charge sheet has already been filed in the matter. He also added that applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 26.04.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the first informant opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that specific allegation for causing grievous injuries to the injured has been made against the applicant as well as co-accused and specific role has been assigned to the present applicant. It is further submitted that the injury report of the victim Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar, Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Madhava Nand Shukla, G.A. Monu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) shows that he received four grievous injuries, which substantiate the allegation of the injured, therefore, he is not entitled to be released on bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and taking into account the fact that specific allegation against the applicant as well as injuries of the injured, therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage. 6. Therefore, the bail application of the applicant is rejected. October 9, 2025 Sanjeet BAIL No. 22501 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad