PRASHANT CHANDRAKANT PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABA/105/2025 · 2025-01-22
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6924 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6924 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 105.25 ABA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2025 PRASHANT CHANDRAKANT PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for Applicant : Adv. Sagar P. Mahale h/f. Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar APP for Respondent-State : Mr. B. B. Bhise ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 22.01.2025 P.C. : 1] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been arrested. As such, the matter is rendered infructuous. 2] Considering the same, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE PRW 2025:BHC-AUG:1817