Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69239 (KAR)

DR.A.MAHADEVA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23908/2025 · 2025-10-30

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43490 WP No. 23908 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 23908 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DR.A.MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O ANKAISH SCIENTIST -D, SERICULTURE BREEDING AND GENETIC SCIENCE CENTER BIDADI UNUIT SERICULTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, SILK FARM ROAD BENGALURU 562 109 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADV.) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTD BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT. OF HORTICULTURE AND SERICULTURE KARNATAKA STATE SERICULTURE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BENGALURU-01 Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43490 WP No. 23908 of 2025 2. THE DIRECTOR THE KARNATAKA STATE SERICULTURE RESEARCH CENTER UNIT THALAGATTAPURA BENGALURU-560109 3. THE COMMISSIONER FOR SERICULTURE DEVELOPMENT AND DIRECTOR OF SERICULTURE M S BUILDING BENGALURU-01 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTER G K V K RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE BENGALURU-96 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADV. FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20.06.2025 PASSED BY THE R2 IN BEARING NUMBER PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -A AND DECLARE MERGING OF THE MORICULTURE WITH THE SERICULTURE ALONG WITH SILK TECHNOLOGY AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND SAME IS WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43490 WP No. 23908 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal stating that the petitioner has not raised certain legal grounds, which are necessary to be pleaded and seeks liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. 2. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB