BASHIR AHMAD MALIK AND ORS. v. NIGHAT FATIMA (HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
CCP(D)/10/2021 · 2025-08-30
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6923 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6923 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR.
LPA No. 133/2019 LPASW No. 21/2019 CCP(D) No. 09/2020 CCP(D) No. 10/2021 WP(C ) No. 236/2023, WP(C ) No. 365/2023 WP(C ) and 367/2023 CCP(S) No. 257/2022 CCP(D) No. 17/2025 CCP(D) No. 76/2024
Reserved on:31.07.2025 Pronounced on: 30 .08.2025 Mudasar Ahmad and others vs State and others Dr. Sartaj Ahmad Ganai and others vs. State and others Dr. Mudasar Ahmad vs. Talat Parvez Rohella Bashir Ahmad Malik vs. Nighat Fatima Naseer Ahmad Sheikh and ors vs. UT and others Dr. Mohd Iqbal Mir and others vs. UT and others Ajaz Hussain and others vs. UT and others Nafees Ahmad Rather and ors vs. Yasmeen Ashaie and ors Tahir Hussain and ors vs. Shantmanu and ors Mohd Yousuf Nengroo & ors vs. Reshmi Singh and ors
For petitioner/appellants
Mr. N.A.Beigh Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohd Murshid Advocate. Mr. Bhat Fayaz Advocate Ms. Nighat Amin Advocate Mr. Arif Sikander Mir Advocate Ms. Syed Shabana Advocate Mr. Mir Majid Bashir Advocate
For respondents: Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway G.A.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR JUDGE
ORDER LPA No. 133/2019 & LPASW No. 21/2019 Since the issues raised in these appeals are identical to those raised in WP(C) No. 416/2024 and other connected matters, which
2
stand disposed of by a detailed judgment of even date rendered separately, the said judgment shall govern the disposal of these appeals.
CCP(D) No. 09/2020 in LPA No. 133/2019 and CCP(D) No. 10/2021 in LPASW No. 21/2019 These contempt petitions have been filed alleging non-compliance of interim orders passed in LPA No. 133/2019 and LPASW No. 21/2019. Since the main appeals now stand finally disposed of by us, the interim orders passed therein have lost their efficacy and stand merged with the final orders. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in the present contempt petitions. Accordingly, the proceedings in these contempt petitions are closed. WP(C ) Nos. 236/2023, 365/2023 and 367/2023
In these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged advertisement notifications whereby applications were invited from eligible candidates for engagement of Lecturers and Teaching Assistants on purely academic arrangement in Kashmir Division Colleges. The judgment passed in WP(C) No. 416/2024 and connected matters, decided by us vide order of even date, shall govern the disposal of these writ petitions as well. However, in cases where the petitioners are found eligible for regularization under the Act of 2010 in terms of the directions passed in WP(C) No. 416/2024 and connected matters, such of the substantive vacant posts held by them as may be the subject matter of the impugned advertisement notifications shall be withdrawn, if not already filled up.
3
CCP(S) No. 257/2022 in WP(C ) No. 2541/2019
This contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of
order dated 29.07.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.2541/2019. Since the present contempt petition arises out of the final order passed by the learned Single Bench, it would be appropriate to place the matter before the learned Single Bench having the roster. Accordingly, Registry is directed to list this contempt petition before the learned Single Bench having the roster, on 15.09.2025.
CCP(D) No. 76/2024 in WP(C) No. 3460/2023 & CCP(D) No.17/2025 in WP(C ) No. 448/2024 The present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful disobedience of interim orders passed in WP(C) No. 3460/2023 and WP(C) No. 448/2024.Since the writ petitions now stand finally
disposed of by us vide order of even date, the interim orders passed therein have lost their efficacy and stand merged with the final orders. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in these contempt petitions. Accordingly, the proceedings in these contempt petitions are closed. Registry shall place a copy of this order in each of the files.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE Jammu 30 .08.2025 Sanjeev Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable:Yes/No Sanjeev Kumar 2025.09.01 13:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document