Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69226 (PNJ)

SUNITA RANI AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/6265/2025 · 2025-06-12

To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[122] Sunita Rani and another State of Haryana and others Coram : Present: ROHIT KAPOOR [1] there is a threat to the life and liberty of the [2] 08.06.2025 of Police, thereupon. [3] [4] behalf of the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to advance notice and waives service. [5] expressing any opinion petitioner respondent No. (Annexure P notified vide Notification dated 17.02.202 [6] 12.06.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6265 Date of Decision : 1 Sunita Rani and another versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Amandeep Singh Gulati, **** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner there is a threat to the life and liberty of the The petitioners have 08.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No. of Police, District Panchkula, however, thereupon. Notice of motion. Mr. Praveen Bhadu, learned Asstt. AG, Haryana, behalf of the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to advance notice and waives service. Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the averme petitioners, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated (Annexure P-5) in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures notified vide Notification dated 17.02.202 Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. .06.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6265-2025 Date of Decision : 12.06.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Amandeep Singh Gulati, Advocate for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. moved representation dated ) to respondent No.2, i.e. the Superintendent , however, no action has been taken Bhadu, learned Asstt. AG, Haryana, appears on behalf of the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 3, on Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without the merits of the averments made by the , the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to to decide the representation dated 08.06.2025 in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures notified vide Notification dated 17.02.2025. the aforesaid terms. (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No contends that moved representation dated Superintendent no action has been taken appears on , on Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without nts made by the , the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to 08.06.2025 in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.12 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document