LPA-1679-2024 (O 102 IN TH STATE OF HA V N GROVER CORAM: HO HO Present: M SANJEEV PR CM-7993-LPA 1. Matter co 2. We have relating t 7993-LPA Main case 3. We find t the earlie Grover a 01.02.201 the inten revised n was found 4. We find t Court’s o hauled up service to 24 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH F HARYANA AND ANOTHER Vs. VER AND OTHERS **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEE **** Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, Sr. DAG, Ha **** V PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) LPA-2024 tter comes up on application for early he have also heard learned counsel for t ating to the judgment passed by the Sin LPA-2024 stands allowed. The main c find that the order passed by Single Jud earlier order passed by this Court in er and others vs. State of Harya 2.2012 and upheld by the Division Ben intent of the judgment and only Re.1 ised non-functional pay scale for the po s found to be patently illegal. find that the action of the State authorit urt’s orders, and certain officers who led up. We deprecate the practice adopt vice to the Court’s orders. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CM-7993-LPA-2024 in/and LPA-1679-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.01.2025 . . . . Appellants . . . . Respondents ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA G, Haryana. ral) rly hearing of the main case. l for the State at length on the issue he Single Judge. Application No.CM- main case is taken on board today. le Judge, whereby he has observed that rt in CWP-14933-1994 titled as V.N. aryana and another, decided on on Bench, was not implemented as per Re.1 enhancement was given in the the post of Executive Engineer which thorities is committing mockery of the who pass such orders deserve to be adopted by the officers in making lip /and M) 2025 s s issue - that .N. on s per the hich f the o be g lip MOHIT GOYAL 2025.01.21 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-1679-2024 (O 5. In the or authoritie learned S scales int and Supe standard were the and relea scales to posts dur the judgm 6. The orde preferred stands un 7. In view o of delay a 8. Implemen observati 9. All pendi 17.01.2025 Mohit goyal 1. Whether s 2. Whether r 24 (O&M) the ordinary course, although this Co horities to grant a particular pay scale f rned Single Judge has taken into conside les into consideration to reach to a find Superintending Engineers would hav ard pay scale in service after the pay re the next promotional posts with effect release all consequential benefits includ les to members of petitioner associatio ts during the period, within six weeks fr judgment. e order by the Single Judge was pass ferred before this Court was filed after nds unexplained. view of above, we dismiss the appeal on delay and laches. mentation of the order shall now be ervations made by the learned Judge hea pending applications also stand disposed (SANJE (ME er speaking/reasoned? Ye er reportable? Ye is Court would not direct the State scale for the higher post, however the onsideration all the aspects and the pay finding that the Executive Engineer ld have to be assigned next higher he pay scale of Rs.4100-5300 as they effect from 01.05.1989 to 31.12.1995, including arrears of salary/revised pay ociation, who were working on those eeks from receiving a certified copy of s passed on 18.10.2023. The appeal after a delay of 229 days which also eal on merits as well as on the ground w be made positively in terms of the ge hearing the contempt proceedings. sposed of accordingly. ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No State r the pay ineer igher they 995, pay those y of peal also ound f the MOHIT GOYAL 2025.01.21 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document