PRAKASH CHANDRA PATHAK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/22684/2025 · 2025-08-19
Raj Beer Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142793
Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 22684 of 2025 Applicant :- Prakash Chandra Pathak And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava,Satya Nisth Dwivedi,Smt. Priyanka Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been preferred for quashing of the impugned discharge order dated 28.05.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 17, Shahjahanpur in Criminal Case No. 1207 of 2018, arising out of Case Crime No. 324 of 2018 (State v. Prakash Chandra Pathak & others), under Sections 307, 323, 504 of IPC, P.S.- Jalalabad, District- Shahjahanpur, pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 17, Shahjahanpur.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the prayer made above is not being pressed and the applicants would appear before the court concerned and a direction may be made to the trial court to decide the bail applications of applicants expeditiously and till then, protection may be granted to them.
4. In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicants appear/ surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with
settled law.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed of. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Rama Kant Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad