Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69209 (BOM)

SHAIKH KHALID BADDIMODDIN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/781/2023 · 2025-11-10

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 50-WP-5225-2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5225 OF 2018 Shaikh Khalid Baddimoddin And Others ….Petitioners VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. M.V. Dhongade, Advocate for the Petitioners Mrs. V.S. Chaudhari, AGP for State Mr. S.S. Shete, Advocate for respondent No. 5 ….. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 781 OF 2023 IN WP/5225/2018 ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 10th NOVEMBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. By this petition, petitioners pray for direction to allow the petitioners to give option to opt for Municipal State Services and absorb the petitioners in State Municipal Services. 2. Admittedly, the petitioners have retired on superannuation during the period between 30th June, 2021 to 31st May, 2024. There were no sanctioned posts on which the petitioners could have been accommodated in Municipal State Services. Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:30857-DB {2} 50-WP-5225-2018 3. In the light of above, due to retirement of petitioners the petition is rendered infructuous and the same is therefore disposed of as such. 4. In view of disposal of writ petition, civil application is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde