Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69208 (ALL)

VEERU @ VEERPAL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22911/2025 · 2025-07-09

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109599 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22911 of 2025 Applicant :- Veeru @ Veerpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Chandra Rajput,Salman Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Salman Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.57 of 2025, under Sections-140(2), 61(2) BNS, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Banda, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant was neither named in the FIR nor the abductee Harish Katiyar has named the applicant regarding his involvement in the abduction of Harish Katiyar. Subsequently, in a separate case, police has arrested the applicant with the allegation of firing at police party. He falsely implicated the applicant in the present case. Though, there is no recovery of any incriminating material against the applicant and Harish Katiyar was also recovered from the custody of other co-accused persons. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 22.01.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Veeru @ Veerpal involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 S.Chaurasia Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad