IN TH 221 Sher Singh Krishan K CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Singh and petition wa predecesso Kumar Sha observed as COCP-3213-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3213 o Date of decision Singh and others Versus Kumar, IAS and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Abhinandan Sethi, Advoc Mr. Raj Kumar Arya, Advocat for the petitioners. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 20.2.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP- h and others vs. State of Punjab and ion was disposed of in terms of order d ecessor Bench of this Court in CWP ar Sharma and another vs. State of rved as under :- “xxx xxx xxx 10. In view of the a anomaly has arisen petitioners being higher while getting a lower p this matter be plac Department in view of t 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3213 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-13.05.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate for dvocate ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- -25444-2023 titled as “Sher b and others”, whereby the writ order dated 26.4.2017 passed by a CWP-18466-2014 titled as “Anuj ate of Punjab”, whereby it was the above situation, where an en in the pay scale of the gher in post than the Restorers, er pay scale, it is directed that placed before the Finance of their own Instructions dated VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.15 08.47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document prays for w May 13, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3213-2025 (O & M) 23.05.2012 for conside anomaly of the petitio the judgment rendered (supra) in mind where been brought on par wit 11. Let this matter be Department/or the Pay true perspective within receipt of a certified co to say in case the claim rejected, a speaking regard, which the petiti challenge. In case cla merit, the monetary be of arrears of pay calculated and paid to months thereafter xxx xxx xxx.” At the very outset, learned c s for withdrawal of the present contem Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 nsideration of removal of pay titioners herein while keeping ered in Gurbir Singh's case here Restorers pay scale has r with Clerks. er be considered by the Finance Pay Anomaly Committee in its thin a period of four months on ed copy of this order. Needless laim of the petitioners is being ing order be passed in this etitioners would be at liberty to claim of the petitioners has y benefits including difference ay accruing there from be id to the petitioners within 2 rned counsel for the petitioners ontempt petition. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.15 08.47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document