Iatharaju Pedapullaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/3989/2020 · 2025-09-01
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6920 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6920 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010067342020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3989/2020 Between:
1. IATHARAJU PEDAPULLAIAH,, S/O.LAXMAIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, R/O.KANNAIGUDEM VILLAGE, YETAPAKA MANDAL,
EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YETAPAKA V AND M, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YETAPAKA V AND M, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YETAPAKA P.S., YETAPAKA VILLAGE AND MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. ITHARAJU BHADRAIAH, S/O.LATE NARSAIAH, R/O.SEETHAMPETA VILLAGE, YETAPAKA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
7. ITHARAJU SAI, S/O.RAJABABU, R/O.KANNAIGUDA VILLAGE, YETAPAKA MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3989 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Police Authorities in not registering the complaints dt.28.1.2020, 3.2.2020, 7.2.2020-modified 8.2.2020 inspite of Law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalith Kumari Vs. Government of U.P. reported in 2014 (2) SCC 1 and colluding with Unofficial Respondents for taking away the crop worth Rs.2.00 lakhs as illegal, arbitrary and in utter violation of Article 21 and 300 (A) of the Constitution of India and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in 2014 (2) SCC (1) and consequently direct the Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, for conducting independent enquiry and investigating the complaints against R)lice officials for not taking necessary action and to pass.…”
2. Heard Ms.V.Shanthi Sree,
learned counsel representing Sri P.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that upon receipt of complaint from the petitioner a crime has been registered in Crime No.20 of 2020 under Sections 447, 427, 506 r/w 34 of IPC dated 08.02.2020.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4
5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.09.2025. UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.3989 of 2020
Dated.02.09.2025
UPS
163