Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12630 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19632 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Connected with (i) Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19637 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mewalal Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. (ii) Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19639 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shobhnath And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. (iii) Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19642 of 2024 Petitioner :- Maan Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. (iv) Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19661 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Janak And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. (v) Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19785 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Bali And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. (vi) Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19804 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Karan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1 and 2 and Shri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Gram Sabha i.e. opposite party no.3. 2. This bunch of writ petitions have been filed for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 12.01.2024 passed by opposite party no.2 in Case No.5173 of 2023, Computerised Case No.T202314360305173, filed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that against the impugned order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, there is a provision for appeal under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, but the petitioners instead of availing the said remedy, have filed these writ petitions, which are not maintainable. 4. In view of the aforesaid, all the writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail the aforesaid remedy of filing an appeal under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within two weeks from today along with an application for interim relief. 5. In case, the petitioners prefer an appeal along with an interim relief application within two weeks from today before the competent court, the court concerned is directed to decide the interim relief application within three weeks from the date of filing of the application for interim relief along with the appeal and thereafter the appeal if any, is pending, the same will be decided in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing. . (Brij Raj Singh, J. ) Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Pks Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad