RAMPAL @ YOGRAJ AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/22336/2024 · 2025-07-15
Deepak Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69180 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69180 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114311 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22336 of 2024 Applicant :- Rampal @ Yograj And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar,Renu Choukl Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Tarun Jha Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 29.07.2021; cognizance order dated 25.08.2021 as well as entire proceedings of Session Suit No.74 of 2024, (State Vs. Rampal and others) arising out of Case Crime No.169 of 2023, under Sections 308, 323, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Garhmukteshwar, District Hapur, pending in the Court of District & Session Judge, Hapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants and opposite party nos.2 & 3 have amicably settled the dispute out of Court and injury received by the injured are grievous in nature but they have compromised the matter in presence of respectable persons of the society and does not want to proceed against the applicants. It is next submitted that the applicants filed 482 Application before this Court to quash the proceedings as both the parties have amicably settled the dispute out of the court. This Court vide orders dated 14.08.2024 & 13.02.2025 directed the parties to appear before the court below for verification of compromise dated 21.05.2024.
4. Pursuant to the said order dated 13.02.2025, the parties appeared before the court below and after due verification of the parties and contents of the compromise made between them, the court vide
order dated 19.05.2025 has passed the verification order. A copy of the same is annexed as Annexure-SA-1 with the second supplementary affidavit.
5. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant and opposite party nos.2 & 3 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party
nos.2 & 3 do not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party nos.2 & 3 are ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party nos.2 & 3 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.
7. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Session Suit No.74 of 2024, (State Vs. Rampal and others) arising out of Case Crime No.169 of 2023, under Sections 308, 323, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Garhmukteshwar, District Hapur, pending in the Court of District & Session Judge, Hapur, is hereby quashed.
8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C is accordingly allowed.
Order Date :- 16.7.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad