Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6917 (CHH)

BRAJESH KRISHNA YADURAJ v. GURU GHASIDAS VISHWAVIDYALAYA (A CENTRAL UNIVERSITY)

WPS/1105/2025 · 2025-02-10

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7221 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1105 of 2025 1 - Brajesh Krishna Yaduraj S/o Late Shri Kuldeep Amrit Yaduraj Aged About 24 Years R/o Kasturba Nagar, Ward No. 19, Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (A Central University) Through Its Registrar, Koni, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G. ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent :- Mr. Soumya Rai, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 10.02.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the petitioners claim for compassionate appointment as per the policy applicable and in view of the principles laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Honb'le Court. VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and decide the application for compassionate appointment submitted by the petitioner in prescribed format within the stipulated time as per law. 10.3 That any other /relief order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding of the cost of the petition may kindly be passed.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved an application for compassionate appointment before the respondent authorities on 22.08.2022, however, even after expiry of more than two years, it has not yet been decided. He submits that the family of the petitioner is facing great hardships due to the death of the sole breadwinner in the family, therefore, his application may be considered and decided within stipulated time. 3. Upon this, learned State counsel submits that the State shall decide the application of the petitioner within four weeks. 4. Looking to the aforesaid submissions, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider & decide the application filed by the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from the date of copy of this order. 5. With this observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha