ca7467.13 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7467 OF 2013 IN FAST/14378/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Gangadhar Sangram Bolegave ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7465 OF 2013 IN FAST/14375/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Jafarsaheb Ismailsab Mujawar ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7466 OF 2013 IN FAST/14375/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Jafarsaheb Ismailsab Mujawar ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7453 OF 2013 IN FAST/14277/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Vaijnath Amrata Bolegave ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7454 OF 2013 IN FAST/14277/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Vaijnath Amrata Bolegave 2025:BHC-AUG:30393 ca7467.13 -2- ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7471 OF 2013 IN FAST/14368/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Narayan Irappa Bolegave ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7472 OF 2013 IN FAST/14368/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Narayan Irappa Bolegave ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7463 OF 2013 IN FAST/14371/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Bhimrao Irappa Bolegave ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7464 OF 2013 IN FAST/14371/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Bhimrao Irappa Bolegave ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7468 OF 2013 IN FAST/14378/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Gangadhar Sangram Bolegave ... ca7467.13 -3- AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7461 OF 2013 IN FAST/14359/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Venkatrao Madhavrao Shetkar, L.rs. Shantabai And Another ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7462 OF 2013 IN FAST/14359/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Venkatrao Madhavrao Shetkar, L.rs. Shantabai And Another ... A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. S.B. Jadhav Advocate for Respondents : Mr. H.B. Nandgavle h/f Mr. V.G. Sakolkar ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 6th NOVEMBER 2025 PER COURT :- 1. These are the applications for condonation of delay of 144 days caused in filing the first appeals. 2. Perused the applications and heard learned advocates for the respective parties. Learned advocate for the respondents- claimants strongly objected the applications. Considering the reasons stated in the applications, it appears that the delay is not deliberate, therefore, the applications are allowed. The delay is condoned in the interest of justice. ca7467.13 -4- 3. In first appeals, issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Nandagavle h/f Mr. Sakolkar, learned advocate, waives notice for the respondents-claimants in respective appeals. 4. List the first appeals for final hearing on 27.11.2025. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/