Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69143 (BOM)

Jasbirsingh K Sandhu v. The Municipal corporation for the city

WP/10315/2025 · 2025-11-07

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10315 OF 2025 Jasbirsingh K Sandhu VERSUS The Municipal Corporation For The City Mr. R. K. Bhakade, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ. DATE : 07th November, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Prayer clause ‘B’ runs thus ;- B] The Respondent authority may kindly be directed to grant 7 days time for removing the encroachment of 2 feet for widing of road Seven Hill to Suitgirni on Plot No. 13, Vijaya Nagar, Aurangabad,on which the petitioner is running his business by name “Hotel New Banjara” on the said plot and for that purpose necessary order may kindly be passed in the interest of justice Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that when the petition was filed on 24.07.2025, the petitioner had made prayer clause ‘B’. However, now the petitioner has removed the alleged encroachment of two feet which was being affected in widing of the road and, therefore, he is not pressing for the said relief. 914-WP-10315-2025.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:30692-DB 3. Prayer clause ‘C’ runs thus :- C] Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition the ad-interim stay may kindly be granted to the News published on 23/07/2025 published in Daily News paper “Dainik LOkmat” [Exhibit- “A”] regarding the widing of the road Seven Hill to Sutgirni road to the extend of petitioners Plot No.13, Vijay Nagar Aurangabad on which the petitioner is running his business by name “Hotel New Banjara” and for that purpose necessary order may kindly be passed. This is in the nature of ad interim stage and there is no substantial prayer in the petition. Further it appears that a civil suit is filed before Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad i.e., Special Civil Suit No. 16/2024 and the petitioner appears to have taken the premises on rent on 25.05.2009 by way of rent agreement. 4. Under such circumstance, nothing remains in the petition. We dispose of the same. (Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.) (Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.) B. S. Joshi 914-WP-10315-2025.odt 2 of 2