IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57116 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2024 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== Lallu Yadav @ Sunil Kumar S/o Kailash Yadav R/o village- Kashipura, P.S.- Magadh Medical, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 358 of 2024 for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3/5 of the BNS lodged on 29.12.2024 by the informant Dharmendra Kumar. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he was going to Gayatri Hospital to see his sister-in-law (bhabhi), the accused persons surrounded him and the allegation is that this petitioner put the pistol in his mouth and enquired whether he should be killed. Later, the allegation is that they resorted to assault and this petitioner gave iron rod blow on his head repeatedly causing injuries. Rajesh Yadav was assaulted by pipe Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57116 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 while Rohit Kumar and Mithilesh Kumar were also assaulted. This caused injuries to the informant but he was shifted to Magadh Medical Hospital which followed the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that exaggerated FIR is there, no such occurrence took place and he intends to co-operate in the investigation and diligently appear in the trial. 5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has taken this Court to learned Sessions Judge's order to show that multiple injuries have been found on the parital region of the informant. Beside, the petitioner also has criminal antecedent. 6. Taking into account the aforesaid fact as also the submission of the parties coupled with the fact that the petitioner has criminal antecedent, it would be appropriate that he seeks bail. 7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. priyanka/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T