IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 248 CWP-19225-2022. Date of Decision: 02.07.2025. M/s Babu Ram Parshotam Lal ....Petitioner. VERSUS Union Bank of India and others ....Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA --- Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinav Bali, Advocate for Mr. Shailender Kashyap, Advocate for respondent-Bank. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the loan account of the petitioner has been settled. 3. The petition stands disposed of as infructuous. 4. Liberty to apply. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 02.07.2025 jitender Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No JITENDER 2025.07.02 17:07 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC