SRI. T L NANDEESHAIAH v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MSA/30/2025 · 2025-11-05
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69111 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69111 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44743 MSA No. 30 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2025 (LA) BETWEEN:
SRI. T L NANDEESHAIAH S/O LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O TIPPUR, KASABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572216 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR .T., ADVOCATE) AND:
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HEMAVATI CANANL ZONE, TUMKURU - 572 101 …RESPONDENT
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.11.2022 PASSED IN RA NO. 157/2021 ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.06.2012 PASSED IN LAC.120/2006 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER 18(3) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44743 MSA No. 30 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time.
2.
Order sheet dated 15.10.2025 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time. Office has raised as many as 5 office objections, even the court fee is pending and the same is not complied even though the matter is list for non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, as a last chance, list this matter on 05.11.2025."
3. The matter is listed for sixth time for compliance of office objections. Still, there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default i.e., for non-prosecution. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
PNV - CT:VS - List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16