Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6911 (JHR)

The Union Of India Through The General Manager Eastern Railway v. Regana Bediya And Ors

FA/90/2016 · 2025-04-02

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025: JHHC: 10359 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 90 of 2016 The Union of India through the General Manager, Eastern Railway Kolkata, P.O. and P.S. Kolkata, District Kolkata, West Bengal 700001 … … Appellant/O.P. No. 2 Versus 1. Regana Bediya, son of Asagnu Bediya 2. Dukhan Bedya, son of Daso Bedya 3. Jageshwar Bediya, son of Sukhdeo Bedia 4. Prabhu Bedia, son of Sukhdeo Bediya 5. Chotu Bediya, son of Sukhdeo Bedia 6. Reeta Kumari, Minor D/o Jagdish Bedia, represented through Charki Devi, W/o Jagdish Bediya 7. Ashwa Devi, wife of Late Pusan Bediya 8. Khaitu Bediya, son of Bhaglahiya Bediya 9. Gurudayal Bediya, son of Sukhdeo Bediya 10. Charki Devi, wife of Jagdish Bediya All are resident of Village Ghutua, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) … … Respondents/Petitioners --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- 08/2nd April 2025 1. This appeal has been filed for the following reliefs: - “ That the present memo of first appeal is filed against the order dated 27.04.2007 and award dated 01.06.2007 passed by Sri Vijay Narayan Singh, the learned Additional District Judge cum Special Judge (L.A.), Hazaribag (now Ramgarh) in L.R. Case No. 29/2006 whereby and whereunder dismissed the review petition on behalf of the appellant and refused to consider the review petition on quantum of compensation amount which was highly inflated by the learned Acquisition Judge for extraneous consideration.” 2025: JHHC: 10359 2 2. I.A. No. 3116 of 2025 has been filed seeking withdrawal of this appeal. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant Ms. Bakshi Vibha has submitted that the appellant be permitted to withdraw this appeal. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. 5. I.A. No. 3116 of 2025 is hereby disposed of. 6. Pending I.A., if any, is closed. 7. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Mukul