IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Roshan Lal since deceased State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr for the petitioner Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner petition with liberty to the petitioner them in terms of Section 21 (4) of the East Punjab Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. In case the through this order Assistant Director period of six months from the date of its filing 4. It is not commented on the merits of the of the aforesaid August 19, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.108+333 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17263 Date of Decision : Roshan Lal since deceased through his LRs Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail the in terms of Section 21 (4) of the East Punjab Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. n case the appeal, for which liberty has been order, is preferred by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by Assistant Director of Consolidation/Deputy Commissioner, Karnal months from the date of its filing, in accordance with law. It is further clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we commented on the merits of the appeal which the petitioner may file aforesaid liberty granted. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 17263 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.08.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI s seeks to withdraw the present the remedy of appeal available to in terms of Section 21 (4) of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. liberty has been sought and got is preferred by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by the ion/Deputy Commissioner, Karnal within a in accordance with law. anting the afore liberty, we have which the petitioner may file in terms DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2025.08.22 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document