PARMINDERJIT KAUR ALIAS PARMINDER KAUR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/6203/2025 · 2025-06-11
Kirti Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69092 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69092 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6203-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.124
CRWP-6203-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.06.2025
Parminderjit Kaur @ Parminder Kaur ..... Petitioner
VERSUS State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH
Present: Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate and Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral)
This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to the official respondent(s) to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of private respondent Nos.5 to 7 (arrayed in the petition) and to take action on her representation dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P4).
2.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P4) before respondent No.3 raising her grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereupon. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if, appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.3, to consider and decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and to take necessary action thereupon.
3.
Notice of motion. Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.11 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-6203-2025 (O&M) 2
4.
Served with an advance copy of the petition, Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course.
5.
In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is
disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P4) of the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law.
6.
Needless to say, if any threat perception is found to the petitioner, the official respondents would provide her adequate security in
order to protect her life and liberty.
(KIRTI SINGH)
JUDGE
11.06.2025 Ramandeep Singh
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.11 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document