Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69091 (BOM)

NITIN SUMATILAL SANGHAVI v. THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETAREY

CP/741/2025 · 2025-12-17

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

934 CONT. PETITION NO. 741 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 934 CONT. PETITION NO. 741 OF 2025 IN CP/320/2025 Nitin Sumatilal Sanghavi VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... • Adv. Dnyaneshwar Suresh Bagul, Advocate for the Petitioner • Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for State ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 17.12.2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. Learned AGP, on instructions from the Desk Officer of Urban Development Department makes a statement that the matter was earlier kept for hearing twice, however, the hearing could not take place. It is further stated that the matter is kept on 24.12.2025 and after hearing the matter on 24.12.2025, the decision will be rendered and communicated to the petitioner within two weeks. 2. We record the said statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of the contempt petition. komal kamble 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:36012-DB 934 CONT. PETITION NO. 741 OF 2025 3. It is made clear that if the time stipulation in the undertaking is not followed, it will be treated as aggravated form of contempt. 4. Needless to state that, the petitioner be heard before passing the order. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 2/2