201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-1945-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 19.06.2025 SURAJ .......APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. D.P.Soni Joura, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. S.S. Pannu, Addl. A.G, Haryana. Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 20.05.2025 passed in FIR No. 45, dated 02.05.2025, U/s 123, 3 (5), 351 (2), 65 (1), 70 (2), 96, 137 of BNS 2023 & Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 (Section 3 (1) (w) (i) of SC & ST Act, 1989 added later on) registered at Women Police Station Sirsa, District Sirsa whereby the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner was got dismissed. Status report by way of affidavit of Vikas Krishan, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sirsa has been filed by learned State Counsel, the same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been furnished to the counsel opposite. Anuradha 2025.06.19 23:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-S-1945-2025 (O&M) 2 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the instant case. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 19.06.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.06.19 23:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document