Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69079 (ALL)

RANJEET YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22505/2025 · 2025-07-14

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114238 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22505 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Yadav,Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anand Kumar Gupta,G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Rajiv Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 146 of 2025, under Sections- 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110, 309(6) of B.N.S., Police Station- Nonhara, District- Ghazipur, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants are innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is further submitted that initially first information report was lodged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110, 309(6) of B.N.S. During investigation Section 110 B.N.S has been deleted and charge sheet was filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 309(6) of B.N.S. It is further submitted that there is no recovery of any incriminating material from the possession of the applicants as alleged in the first information report. The alleged recovery is made from co-accused Vishal Yadav who was shown to be in possession of Rs. 6620/-. It is further submitted that general allegation has been made against all the accused persons. Charge sheet has already been submitted, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicants are law abiding citizen and they are languishing in jail since 23.05.2025 having no criminal history. In case, they are granted bail, they will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicants- Ranjeet Yadav and Raj Narayan Yadav involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicants shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicants and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 PS Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad