- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25320 WP No. 33599 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 33599 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MINDLOGICX INFRATEC LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 'TECHLLANO', NO.10/B, GRAPHITE INDIA ROAD, KR PURAM, HOODI VILLAGE, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI SRIJITH PS … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJAY H SETHIYA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES OFFICE AT E WING, 2ND FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADAN, SANTHOSHPURAM, KUDREMUKH COLONY, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034 2. SMT. RAMANATHAN BHUVANESHWARI, INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF M/S. MINDLOGICX INFRATEC LIMITED Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25320 WP No. 33599 of 2024 RESIDING AT C-006, PIONEER PARADISE, 24TH MAIN ROAD, 7TH PHASE, JP NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 078 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINANDAN K., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI HEMANTH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO FILE INC-28 BEFORE THE R-1; TO GRANT COSTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to file INC-28 before the respondent No.1, i.e. Registrar of Companies. Though various contentions have been raised, the limited prayer sought for is a direction to respondent No.2 to file INC-28. 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that the filing of INC-28 would require compliance with Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation 30A of IBC CIRP Regulations. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25320 WP No. 33599 of 2024 3. In light of the limited prayer sought, it would not be appropriate for the Court to enter into other aspects of detailing the procedure to be followed. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off directing the respondent No.2 to consider the request of petitioner as made at prayer (a) under Section 12A read with Regulation 30A of the Regulations. All other contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR