Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69059 (PNJ)

MAHENDER SINGH ALIAS SWAMI MAHENDERANAND MAHARAJ v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/6249/2025 · 2025-06-12

To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[119] Mahender Singh alias Swami Mahendernand Maharaj State of Haryana and others Coram : Present: ROHIT KAPOOR [1] is a threat to the life and liberty o [2] to respondent No.4 representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani thereupon. [3] [4] the official respondents waives service. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6249 Date of Decision : 1 Mahender Singh alias Swami Mahendernand Maharaj versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Shivpartap Singh Khattra, for the petitioner. **** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. He has moved representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P to respondent No.4, i.e. Station House Officer (SHO), Tosham and representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P Superintendent of Police, Bhiwani, however, thereupon. Notice of motion. Mr. Praveen Bhadu, Asstt. AG, Haryana, appears on behalf of the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 4 waives service. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6249-2025 Date of Decision : 12.06.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Shivpartap Singh Khattra, Advocate Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that there the petitioner. He has moved representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P i.e. Station House Officer (SHO), Tosham and representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.3, , however, no action has been taken Mr. Praveen Bhadu, Asstt. AG, Haryana, appears on behalf of i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 4, on advance notice and contends that there He has moved representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) i.e. Station House Officer (SHO), Tosham and i.e. no action has been taken Mr. Praveen Bhadu, Asstt. AG, Haryana, appears on behalf of notice and RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.12 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6249 [5] expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to No.3 to decide the representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P period of one month. [6] 12.06.2025 ‘R. Sharma' 6249-2025 Keeping in view the limited prayer expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to No.3 to decide the representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P period of one month.. Disposed of with the aforesaid terms. .06.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -2- Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) within a Disposed of with the aforesaid terms. (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No and without expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the respondent 6) within a RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.12 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document