RAKESH DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31994/2025 · 2025-08-04
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69047 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69047 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-31994-2025 Date of decision: 04.08.2025 RAKESH DEVI AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Deepam Raghav, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG, Haryana.
**** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The instant petition under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.167 dated 28.05.2025, under Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 333, 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 registered at Police Station Pataudi, Gurugram.
2.
This Court vide order dated 10.06.2025, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioners, subject to their joining the investigation.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in pursuance to the order dated 10.06.2025, the petitioners have joined the investigation.
4.
Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required.
5.
In view of the above, the order dated 10.06.2025 is made absolute.
6.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) August 04, 2025
JUDGE manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No MANISHA 2025.08.05 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document