- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41835 WP No. 1800 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 1800 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT CHANDRAMMA H M W/O LATE SIDDARAJU M AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 2. MR. UMASHANKAR S S/O LATE SIDDARAJU M AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3. MR. DHANASSHEKAR S S/O LATE SIDDARAJU M AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 4. MRS MADHUSHREE D/O LATE SIDDARAJU M AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO 04, OLD NO 50, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, BAPUJI NAGARA, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 026. 5. MR CHANDRASHEKAR S S/O LATE SHAMBUAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.04, OLD NO 50, 4TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41835 WP No. 1800 of 2023 BAPUJI NAGARA, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 026. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD., ADVOCATE) AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER SREE SUBRAMANYASESHWARA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD, RAJATHA BHAVANA, NO.106, R V ROAD, V V PURAM, BENGALURU- 576 004. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NATARAJ DONKENNANAVAR., ADVOCATE) ------ THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.01.2023 IN CRL MISC.NO.7553/2022 PASSED BY THE 30TH ADDL.CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU (ANNEXURE- B). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41835 WP No. 1800 of 2023 ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the Petitioners are assailing the order dated 19.01.2023 in Crl.Misc.No.7553 of 2022 on the file of XXX Additional CMM, Bengaluru (Annexure-B). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent, invited the attention of the Court to the memo dated 29.08.2023 and submitted that, the Petitioners have no liabilities as the Respondent-Bank has issued NOC to the Petitioners. 3. In that view of the matter, recording to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent- Bank, I am of the view that the prayer made in the writ petition does survive for consideration. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35