245. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ajay Kumar State of Punjab and another CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. quashing of FIR No.87, dated 01.09.2015, registered under Sections 494, 406, 420, 380 IPC (Sections 497, 498, 506, 120 lateron) at Police Station Satnampura, District Phagwara (Annexure P on the basis of oral compromise entered into between the petitioner, co accused and the 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ajay Kumar Versus Punjab and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Maninder Singh Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Senior DAG, Punjab. Ms. Riya Malik, Ms. Anukriti Sharma, Advocates, for Mr. Varun Goyal, Advocate, for respo ------ NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section quashing of FIR No.87, dated 01.09.2015, registered under Sections 494, 406, 420, 380 IPC (Sections 497, 498, 506, 120 at Police Station Satnampura, District Phagwara (Annexure P on the basis of oral compromise entered into between the petitioner, co accused and the complainant. On 10.02.2025, the following order was passed: “Learned State counsel submits that the present petition filed through the SPA is not maintainable as the petitioner himself is available and it has wrongly been recorded in the order dated 17.09.2024 that he is presently residing abroad. He seeks time to file status report by a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35774-2024 Date of decision: 06.08.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Maninder Singh Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Senior DAG, Punjab. Ms. Riya Malik, Ms. Anukriti Sharma, Advocates, for Mr. Varun Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.87, dated 01.09.2015, registered under Sections 494, 406, 420, 380 IPC (Sections 497, 498, 506, 120-B, 420, 120-B IPC added at Police Station Satnampura, District Phagwara (Annexure P-1), on the basis of oral compromise entered into between the petitioner, co- On 10.02.2025, the following order was passed:- submits that the present petition filed through the SPA is not maintainable as the petitioner himself is available and it has wrongly been recorded in the order dated 17.09.2024 that he is presently residing abroad. He seeks time to file status report by attaching all the zimni 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.87, dated 01.09.2015, registered under Sections 494, dded 1), - submits that the present petition filed through the SPA is not maintainable as the petitioner himself is available and it has wrongly been recorded in the order dated 17.09.2024 that he is presently residing abroad. He SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.08.07 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-35774-2024 - 2 - orders, whereby proclamation proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner. Let the needful be done within a period of 03 weeks. Adjourned to 30.04.2025.” 3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause of action at an appropriate stage. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE August 06, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.08.07 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document