Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69040 (KAR)

SMT.JAYALAKSHMAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11830/2020 · 2025-11-03

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44057 WP No. 11830 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 11830 OF 2020 (SCST) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY AGED 60 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DIST-560 064 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. M B CHANDRACHOODA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44057 WP No. 11830 of 2020 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, YELAHANKA , BENGALURU-560 064. 5. SRI.N.VENKATESH S/O LATE K.V.NARAYANASWAMY, AGED 59 YEARS 6. SMT.VISHALAKSHI W/O N.VENKATESH, AGED 54 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE R/AT NO.273, 7TH CROSS, JAKKUR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 064. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. J.M. BYRAREDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2019 IN CASE NO.SC-ST (APPEAL) 28/2009-10, ON THE FILE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-J, BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44057 WP No. 11830 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as follows: "The petitioner above named states that the dispute between the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6 has been amicably settled in the suit instituted by the petitioner against respondents 5 and 6 in O.S.No. 3443/2016 on the file of City Civil Judge, Bengaluru. The compromise petition has been filed before the Hon'ble Court on 08.07.2023 and the same was accepted, the Hon'ble Court has disposed of the suit in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. Hence, the petitioner seeks the permission of this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition in the interest of justice." 2. Taking note of the contents of the memo and noticing that the petitioner has asserted that the dispute has been amicably settled, the petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44057 WP No. 11830 of 2020 In light of the disposal of the writ petition, I.A.1/2023 filed for impleading is disposed of as not calling for further orders. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP