Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37832 RPFC No. 34 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 34 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
SRI V.R.SRINIVAS SON OF LATE V RAMU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.45/17 19TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS MUNESHWARA BLOCK, AVALAHALLI BANGALORE -560 026 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA K.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT.ROOPA SHILPA WIFE OF SRI V.R.SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/A NO.30/1, JAI STREET MAIN ROAD DENKANIKOTA -0635107 KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. KRISHNASWAMY K., ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2022 PASSED IN Crl.MISC.NO.217/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE. PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.127 (1) AND (2) OF Cr.P.C FOR ENHANCE THE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37832 RPFC No. 34 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today. An order was passed on 15.09.2025 which reads thus as follow:
“A memo of retirement is filed, just by filing the notice that is sent, no acknowledgment is filed and there is no representation before this Court. By filing the memo of retirement, without the Court's permission the advocate cannot presume that he retired from the case. List this matter under the same caption on
18.09.2025. On that day, if the counsels fails to appear before the Court, cost of Rs.10,000/- shall be paid to the Advocates’ Association”. Inspite of the same, the learned counsel is not present before the court. This shows the conduct of the counsel and he has no respect to the orders of the Court. Ultimately, he is answerable to his client.
As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the RPFC is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TS/List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1