SRI. LATE VENUGOPAL REDDY SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS. MR. SANDEEP REDDY v. SMT. CHINNAMMA
RFA/287/2024 · 2025-09-13
Lok Adalath
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69024 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69024 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 - HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT BENGALURU
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
AND
SRI MAHESH SHETTY, MEMBER
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.287 OF 2024 (Lok Adalat No.5965/2025 )
BETWEEN:
SRI. LATE VENUGOPAL REDDY SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
1.
MR. SANDEEP REDDY S/O VENUGOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
2.
MR. SUNIL REDDY S/O VENUGOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
3.
MR. MANOJ REDDY S/O VENUGOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.29/2A ARALUKUNTE GRAMA BENGALURU - 102.
...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. AMITH XAVIER C., ADVOCATE)
- 2 - AND:
SMT. CHINNAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.20, 18TH MAIN ROAD SRINAGARA BENGALURU - 560050.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPALA NAIDU, ADVOCATE )
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH
ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2024 PASSED IN O.S. NO.5853/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS RFA COMING BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT TODAY, ON BEING REFERRED BY THE COURT, E.S.INDIRESH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:-
CONCILIATION ORDER
1. Both the parties are present along with their respective
learned counsel.
- 3 -
2. The parties have filed joint memo wherein the appellants agreed to pay Rs.1,75,000/- to the respondent in terms of the joint memo dated 13.09.2025. The said memo is signed by both side parties and their respective learned counsels.
3. The joint memo dated 13.09.2025 is accepted and accordingly, the Regular First Appeal No.287/2024 is disposed of, as per the settlement arrived at between the parties, in terms of the joint memo.
4. Registry is directed to refund the admissible court fee in favour of appellant/s, after due identification.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
MEMBER
sac