Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6116-2025 Date of Decision: 11.06.2025
DILBAGH SINGH
... PETITIONER VS.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Dipanshu Kapur, Advocate, for Mr. S.S.Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab. ****
1. The petitioner in the instant petition has inter-alia sought quashing of impugned order dated 30.09.2024 (Annexure P-2), whereby, his case for grant of pre-mature release has been rejected and has also sought mandamus directing the respondent(s) to further extend the interim bail granted by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran, whereby, he was released on interim bail since 03.10.2023.
2. The petitioner also seeks stay of operation of letter dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P-4) issued by Superintendent Central Jail, Sh. Goindwal Sahib (respondent No.3), whereby, he has been intimated regarding cancellation of his interim bail in view of rejection of his application for pre-mature release by the competent authority of the Government of Punjab and issuance of non-bailable warrants dated 17.03.2025 with a further direction to surrender before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran as soon as possible. SMRITI 2025.06.11 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CRWP-6116-2025 -2-
3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the instant petition, however, the petitioner be granted two weeks time for surrendering before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran.
4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, purely in the interest of justice, the petitioner is granted one week's time to surrender before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran on or before 18.06.2025, failing which the competent Court would be free to initiate action against the petitioner, in accordance with law. 11.06.2025
(ROHIT KAPOOR) smriti
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.06.11 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment