Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:19188
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 987 of 2021 1 - Jeevan Lal Rathiya S/o Shri Amar Singh Rathiya Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Baihamuda,tahsil And Police Station Gharghoda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 2 - Tulsikrit Rathiya S/o Shri Amar Singh Rathiya Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Baihamuda,tahsil And Police Station Gharghoda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 3 - Goverdhan Rathiya S/o Shri Amar Singh Rathiya Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Baihamuda,tahsil And Police Station Gharghoda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Rasila Rathiya W/o Mahettar Rathiya Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Baihamuda,tahsil And Police Station Gharghoda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Water Resources, Mahandi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Managing Director South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Raigarh, District Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gharghoda District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.28 17:40:37 +0530
2 For Petitioner : Mr. Prabhu Lal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Jeeta Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Lav Sharma, P.L. For Respondent No. 4 : Ms. Nikita Dubey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 28-04-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have taken back the brief from the office, therefore, he has no instruction in the matter. 2) Consequently, instant writ petition stands dismissed on this count alone. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya